 |
|

10-26-2008, 01:06 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: United States - California
Posts: 353
|
|
Urgent must read and reply!!!!!
for me and my family at least
ok so we are looking at a 2005 Kia Sedona and I was wondering if you guys/gals had any input. ya know if they are crap or a good van
please reply I need your input
__________________
If you wanna dance with the Devil get a Diablo. But if you want to Tango with time take the Z Tavio
|

10-26-2008, 04:54 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: United States - Iowa
Posts: 593
|
|
Personally I would stay away from Korean vehicles just yet. In the last year they have been getting a lot better, but the older they get the the more problems frequent them. I would highly, highly recommend looking up the JD Power ratings as well as Consumer Reports and Edmunds to get an idea of what the frequent issues are, you can never do too much homework when shopping for a vehicle. While you're at it if your family is really serious about buying the car, run an appraisal on the vehicle to the exact specs of the one you are looking at through Kelly blue book, edmunds, and check the NADA book value and bring that paperwork in just in case you need to haggle a price. I knocked $2000 off the initial asking price on my Chevy that way.
__________________
2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SuperSport
|

10-26-2008, 06:39 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 536
|
|
they are crap.... they break easily.. my mom rented one and at age 10 i ripped off the interior handle... my mom checked them out and they got ok mileage.. do not buy... they are cheap crap made by koreans .....
|

10-26-2008, 10:42 AM
|
 |
|
|
Location: United Arab Emirates
Posts: n/a
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmc91
for me and my family at least
ok so we are looking at a 2005 Kia Sedona and I was wondering if you guys/gals had any input. ya know if they are crap or a good van
please reply I need your input
|
I highly recommend any SATURN.....better than honda and kia.
If you are buying the car used. Please ask the owner for a service record of the car. This will ensure the car was well care for and it will be easier for you to own the car. small engine require frequent servicing since they work harder than any other engine.
good luck
Last edited by steveX : 10-26-2008 at 10:48 AM.
|

10-26-2008, 10:55 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: United States - Pennsylvania
Posts: 210
|
|
I would have to agree with Mesarius. Korean is not the same as Japanese. The Koreans have a lot of work to do before making a quality car. That's why the price is so cheap. As far as Saturn is concerned, I would stay away from them too. They have the most electrical problems I've seen from any manufacturer. I hate to say it, but as far as getting the most for what you paid for, You have a much better chance with something from Honda, Toyota or Mitsubishi. I'm still not so sure about Suzuki, either.
|

10-26-2008, 11:56 AM
|
 |
|
|
Location: United Arab Emirates
Posts: n/a
|
|
You have worst chance with something from Honda, Toyota or Mitsubishi. I'm still not so sure about Suzuki  , either.
If you look at the 4 cylinder engine you will notice the famous TIMING BELT (RUBBER/CONDOM  ) most of the car above use a hydraulic timing belt tension , which are famous for leaking oil onto the timing belt (rubber) and causing breakage and major engine damage. The Honda h22 and vtec feature a hydraulic tension so does Mitsubishi.
I own a 97 saturn with 240,000 miles (factory engine and trans)Lots of NYC stop and go driving. the engine is a original 1.9 liter SOHC and NEVER has electrical problem. He must be taking about FORDS. Also timing belt replacement can be a costly maintain ($500+). If its not done right, the engine will get ruin (bend valves).
A timing chain like Saturn/GM use is a way better choice. Honda/Toyota and Mitsubishi are stupid/complex engineering to keep the owner out from under the hood.
Why would anyone want to replace a RUBBER timing belt every 60,000 miles when you can drive a Saturn for 200,000+ mile with no $500+ timing belt replacement?. A Saturn offer BETTER gas millage, because it GM efi technology. the same technology Honda and Toyota buys/share with GM.
BUT you should still buy a import, If you like problem with used/abuse import cars.
GOOD LUCK 
|

10-26-2008, 03:36 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,073
|
|
Buy American.
My family and I rented one of these in california, and it worked well and all that, but it was poorly designed. The back window rattled like it was its job, and I just thought the overall controls of the back seat were awkward.
__________________
2003 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra
4.6L DOHC V8 - 6 speed manual
520rwhp - 525rwtq at 16psi on stock blower
2002 Ford Mustang GT
4.6L V8 - 5 speed manual
|

10-26-2008, 07:09 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: United States - Pennsylvania
Posts: 210
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveX
You have worst chance with something from Honda, Toyota or Mitsubishi. I'm still not so sure about Suzuki  , either.
If you look at the 4 cylinder engine you will notice the famous TIMING BELT (RUBBER/CONDOM  ) most of the car above use a hydraulic timing belt tension , which are famous for leaking oil onto the timing belt (rubber) and causing breakage and major engine damage. The Honda h22 and vtec feature a hydraulic tension so does Mitsubishi.
I own a 97 saturn with 240,000 miles (factory engine and trans)Lots of NYC stop and go driving. the engine is a original 1.9 liter SOHC and NEVER has electrical problem. He must be taking about FORDS. Also timing belt replacement can be a costly maintain ($500+). If its not done right, the engine will get ruin (bend valves).
A timing chain like Saturn/GM use is a way better choice. Honda/Toyota and Mitsubishi are stupid/complex engineering to keep the owner out from under the hood.
Why would anyone want to replace a RUBBER timing belt every 60,000 miles when you can drive a Saturn for 200,000+ mile with no $500+ timing belt replacement?. A Saturn offer BETTER gas millage, because it GM efi technology. the same technology Honda and Toyota buys/share with GM.
BUT you should still buy a import, If you like problem with used/abuse import cars.
GOOD LUCK 
|
You got lucky with that Saturn. Out of the 13 people I know that have owned them, 2 have started fires under the hood, 3 have needed the emu's reprogrammed (2 of those multiple times), 2 developed shorts(not to include the fire starters), 1 kept eating alternators and 1broke the timing chain at 113,000 mi. Not to mention the fact that the automotive wiring shop that my uncle works for gets about 30% of their business from Saturn vehicles. And you're missing the point. Every car today is made to be complex enough to keep the owner out from under the hood. We don't live in the 50's anymore. the latest technology is not a toaster oven. Why would cars be any different? The fact is that every single car from a major manufacturer, whether foreign or domestic, is now made to fail as soon as possible and require special tools and knowledge to repair so that you must take it to the dealership to have anything fixed. In this case, it is best to choose a vehicle on a track record of longevity vs mechanical failures. Sorry you haven't already figured this out, but Saturn, as a whole, does not have the best stats in this category.
|

10-27-2008, 09:02 AM
|
 |
|
|
Location: United Arab Emirates
Posts: n/a
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MY69GOAT
You got lucky with that Saturn. Out of the 13 people I know that have owned them, 2 have started fires under the hood, 3 have needed the emu's reprogrammed (2 of those multiple times), 2 developed shorts(not to include the fire starters), 1 kept eating alternators and 1broke the timing chain at 113,000 mi. Not to mention the fact that the automotive wiring shop that my uncle works for gets about 30% of their business from Saturn vehicles. And you're missing the point. Every car today is made to be complex enough to keep the owner out from under the hood. We don't live in the 50's anymore. the latest technology is not a toaster oven. Why would cars be any different? The fact is that every single car from a major manufacturer, whether foreign or domestic, is now made to fail as soon as possible and require special tools and knowledge to repair so that you must take it to the dealership to have anything fixed. In this case, it is best to choose a vehicle on a track record of longevity vs mechanical failures. Sorry you haven't already figured this out, but Saturn, as a whole, does not have the best stats in this category.
|
HELLO OBAMA VOTER:
Cars are not human. so it is fair to say, Cars go bad because of human error and carelessness. The only reason a fire will start, is UN-Qualify repair work. Today everybody is a automotive tech and yet most of they buy a lemon  .
Only the communist car maker will sell you a poor quality product, so you keep spending cash like it insurance policy.
The import cars use a cheaper (thinner gauge) wire when compare to American. Don`t forget if you buy a import car after 9/11. Your NEW car is made with World Trade Center Steel....So let us know if you smell the dead body's...
Yea, your import car is a driving grave yard....LOL. no wonder more people are dieing in cars than before. Could it be, the steel was weaken by 2000+ degree heat?. MADE IN CHINA WITH WTC STEEL.
YouTube - 911 Truth: Rudy Giuliani & the Feds Destroyed WTC Evidence
Ship to build communist car?
9-11: Rudy Giuliani & the Feds Destroyed the WTC Demolition Evidence - MSN Video
How many cars can 200,000,000 tons of steel build?.
Dailymotion - Ironworkers Describe WTC Steel Anomalies, a video from BadKitty. 9/11, 9-11, 911, wtc, war
Last edited by steveX : 10-27-2008 at 09:40 AM.
|

10-27-2008, 02:01 PM
|
 |
 Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: United States - California
Posts: 322
|
|
Once again, this is getting off topic and pointless. To prove a point : IIHS-HLDI: Midsize moderately priced cars - Current Models
Notice that 5 out of the 6 top safety pics are import cars...
Back on subject, I would advise against an '05 Kia. It's true that Kia is now making a decent product, but earlier models were plagued with poor quality and poor reliability. I think it's too much of a gamble. When it comes to reliability ratings, the Toyota Sienna and Honda Odyssey are on top.
|

10-27-2008, 04:36 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,073
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperchargedXJ
Once again, this is getting off topic and pointless. To prove a point : IIHS-HLDI: Midsize moderately priced cars - Current Models
Notice that 5 out of the 6 top safety pics are import cars...
Back on subject, I would advise against an '05 Kia. It's true that Kia is now making a decent product, but earlier models were plagued with poor quality and poor reliability. I think it's too much of a gamble. When it comes to reliability ratings, the Toyota Sienna and Honda Odyssey are on top.
|
Haha I agree.. if anything MY69GOAT sounds rather conservative, however, I did get a laugh out of that. I really am not a fan of Japanese imports, although I will admit they probably have the best minivans. Despite that, they are higher priced. I'd recommend getting a Dodge Grand Caravan or a Chrysler Town & Country. In my opinion, the best domestic minivans, and you can get them pretty cheap too.
__________________
2003 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra
4.6L DOHC V8 - 6 speed manual
520rwhp - 525rwtq at 16psi on stock blower
2002 Ford Mustang GT
4.6L V8 - 5 speed manual
|

10-27-2008, 05:23 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: United States - Illinois
Posts: 803
|
|
I'd be a little nervous about a Kia aswell.
Here is an alternative idea that I haven't seen mentioned yet:
It is probably what I would get if I was in the market for a van. Well, any 70's styled custom van. One with side pipes and a huge airbrushed mural on the sides of a scantily clad woman riding a dragon through a gothic mountain scene... wall to wall shag carpet and some teardrop shaped bubble windows would be really nice too.

|

10-27-2008, 05:34 PM
|
 |
 Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: United States - California
Posts: 322
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnnyboy
I'd be a little nervous about a Kia aswell.
Here is an alternative idea that I haven't seen mentioned yet:
It is probably what I would get if I was in the market for a van. Well, any 70's styled custom van. One with side pipes and a huge airbrushed mural on the sides of a scantily clad woman riding a dragon through a gothic mountain scene... wall to wall shag carpet and some teardrop shaped bubble windows would be really nice too.

|
Better fix that link, now I really want to see this van. Sounds like a "Shaggin' Wagon" 
|

10-27-2008, 07:27 PM
|
 |
|
|
Location: United Arab Emirates
Posts: n/a
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperchargedXJ
|
YEA  , another Government funded puppets To help push the import product/market/economy. White collar work telling you about automotive safety  ... . Since the IIHS has been around, did they help reduce your insurance premium or highway safety ?...now they are tell you about car safety....  .
Don`t listen to me, i`m just a one man team. and i know whats best for me since i`m a automotive tech.
|

10-27-2008, 08:35 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,073
|
|
Consumer Reports and other liberal press loves Japanese imports... just thought I'd throw that in.
__________________
2003 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra
4.6L DOHC V8 - 6 speed manual
520rwhp - 525rwtq at 16psi on stock blower
2002 Ford Mustang GT
4.6L V8 - 5 speed manual
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49 PM.
|