Welcome Guest Login or Signup
LIVE CHAT | INSTANT MESSENGER | BOOKMARK

Go Back   Gears Garage Auto Forum > Auto Forum > European Autos

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-31-2009, 12:07 AM
apolloGT's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,073
Default Volvo C30

I had a chance to take a close look at a Volvo C30 tonight. I was extremely impressed. IMO, the exterior is very modern and sleek, especially the white with the R skirts and front splitter. With the 6 speed manual, it's pretty quick.. it has a turbo 5 cylinder, which I guess is easily modified.

Confession: I kinda want one.

__________________
2003 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra
4.6L DOHC V8 - 6 speed manual
520rwhp - 525rwtq at 16psi on stock blower
2002 Ford Mustang GT
4.6L V8 - 5 speed manual
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-31-2009, 12:20 AM
mesarius's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: United States - Iowa
Posts: 593
Default

The rear end on those things look really weird, but I'm right there with you in wanting one. If you open up the exhaust on those inline 5's they sound just like their bigger V10 Brother and I bet you could pull quite a bit more out of that motor. I've been really impressed with Volvo lately. I used to think of Volvos as cars that English teachers drive, boxy little things. Lately though especially with the newer R-spec cars they have been really impressive both in looks and amenitites. I've wanted a Volvo since I first saw an S60R when I was shopping for the Monte, and the C30 is just a cool little car I want it just as much.
__________________
2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SuperSport
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-31-2009, 12:57 AM
SuperchargedXJ's Avatar


Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: United States - California
Posts: 322
Default

While I agree that this car has decent technology, good fuel economy and respectable power... I can't get deal with looks. The front end is OK to look at, but the rear end is downright ugly. It's like VW Beetle meets Ford Pinto!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-31-2009, 02:20 AM
mesarius's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: United States - Iowa
Posts: 593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperchargedXJ View Post
While I agree that this car has decent technology, good fuel economy and respectable power... I can't get deal with looks. The front end is OK to look at, but the rear end is downright ugly. It's like VW Beetle meets Ford Pinto!
That tailgate is pretty much the only unattractive part of the car though, you have to admit. If they would maybe ditch the glass hatch it might not look so bad. With the rear seats down you'll have some great rearward visibility, though.
__________________
2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SuperSport
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-31-2009, 09:31 AM
sccavette's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: United States - Indiana
Posts: 297
Default

I think it looks pretty cool!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-31-2009, 10:58 AM
apolloGT's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,073
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperchargedXJ View Post
While I agree that this car has decent technology, good fuel economy and respectable power... I can't get deal with looks. The front end is OK to look at, but the rear end is downright ugly. It's like VW Beetle meets Ford Pinto!
I don't know.. I kinda like the back.. I mean, it is a hatchback after all.
__________________
2003 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra
4.6L DOHC V8 - 6 speed manual
520rwhp - 525rwtq at 16psi on stock blower
2002 Ford Mustang GT
4.6L V8 - 5 speed manual
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-31-2009, 07:16 PM
shelbyy's Avatar

 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: United States - Pennsylvania
Posts: 96
Default

I actually really like the back too, I think it's pretty neat. My friend just got one and it's a nice little car.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-31-2009, 10:23 PM
SuperchargedXJ's Avatar


Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: United States - California
Posts: 322
Default

I looked at what seemed like hundreds of pictures of this car today and no matter how much I try I can't find it attractive. If it had a completely different rear end then it might be acceptable but to me, that back end is serious ugly!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-31-2009, 11:30 PM
ADDirishboy's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United States - Arizona
Posts: 13
Default

Looks kinda like a Golf, but it's more like a Golf with down-syndrome
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2009, 03:04 AM
mesarius's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: United States - Iowa
Posts: 593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ADDirishboy View Post
Looks kinda like a Golf, but it's more like a Golf with down-syndrome
I would honestly take the C30 over the Golf, though.
__________________
2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SuperSport
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2009, 02:17 PM
apolloGT's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: United States -
Posts: 1,073
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mesarius View Post
I would honestly take the C30 over the Golf, though.
yeah the Golf is very mainstream. I think the C30 has more personality, and it's even faster than the GTI.
__________________
2003 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra
4.6L DOHC V8 - 6 speed manual
520rwhp - 525rwtq at 16psi on stock blower
2002 Ford Mustang GT
4.6L V8 - 5 speed manual
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:59 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.



GearsGarage.com Copyright 2007