Welcome Guest Login or Signup
LIVE CHAT | BOOKMARK

Go Back   Gears Garage Forum > Auto Forum > American Autos

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 09-04-2008, 02:47 AM
apolloGT's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: United States - New York
Posts: 733
Default

eh, not so much me. I can understand your passion for a certain car.... I definitely have it for the Corvette and the Mustang.

Having said that, I like the new definition of fast. High horsepower and nice handling (Z06, GT500KR etc)
__________________
02 Ford Mustang GT
4.6 L - 2V - 5 speed

thunderhorse
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2008, 01:35 AM
sniperofbuffalo's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: United States - New York
Posts: 783
Default

I'mma put a supercharged Honda B18 in my Escort =P
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2008, 02:36 AM
dmc91's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: United States - California
Posts: 239
Default

you do that.
__________________
If you wanna dance with the Devil get a Diablo but if you want a blast from the past get a DeLorean.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2008, 12:36 AM
MY69GOAT's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: United States - Pennsylvania
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Webstad View Post
I'm throwing with the DeLorean here. Those Vettes were garbage. All you got was a 200hp V8 that got terrible gas mileage, and they are a dime a dozen. Sure, they look nice, but they aren't that great. In fact, when you look at the numbers, they're the worst Vettes ever built. At least there's some sort of exclusivity with the DeLorean. Plus it looks cool.

Btw, have any of you ever driven an older Vette? I have, and they are no screaming hell. Horrible visibility, terrible ride, goofy suspension, and it felt cheap. Now don't get me wrong, I love Vettes; just not these ones.
The worst vette ever built (by numbers) was the '77. Facts are facts. And yes I have driven a few of this generation of vettes, even the 454 4-speed model, and I don't totally agree with you. It's not a Mercedes, it's a vette. It's not supposed to be comfortable, it's supposed to be scary. Adrenaline rush and image are the real driving design behind the vette. Sure, most car guys would rather have a duesenberg than a vette because we all know the status quo on a duesy. The average person however, is only going to see "an old car". They all know what a vette is though. So, if it was for a collection, the delorean. For driving, the vette.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2008, 01:24 AM
dmc91's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: United States - California
Posts: 239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MY69GOAT View Post
The worst vette ever built (by numbers) was the '77. Facts are facts. And yes I have driven a few of this generation of vettes, even the 454 4-speed model, and I don't totally agree with you. It's not a Mercedes, it's a vette. It's not supposed to be comfortable, it's supposed to be scary. Adrenaline rush and image are the real driving design behind the vette. Sure, most car guys would rather have a duesenberg than a vette because we all know the status quo on a duesy. The average person however, is only going to see "an old car". They all know what a vette is though. So, if it was for a collection, the delorean. For driving, the vette.
thank you for your input.
__________________
If you wanna dance with the Devil get a Diablo but if you want a blast from the past get a DeLorean.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:26 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.



GearsGarage.com Copyright 2007