Quote:
Originally Posted by steveX
It still does explain the 3.9 liter fuel consumption rating. That statement is back-ward, or maybe i am. I`ve been build engine for over 10 yrs and have seen the rotary engine internally.
In you statement you claim the rotary engine is equivalent to the piston.... 
I have no more to say. |
The high fuel consumption doesn't really need any explanation, it is just the nature of that type of engine. Rotary engines have never been considered fuel efficient. Also I don't remember ever saying a rotary was like a piston engine, just highliging the differences between the two.